|
 |
 |
|
Seventeen Hairs | The State's Car Wash Theory | The Hair Evidence | So Many Unanswered Questions | Scratch Marks Found Inside the Trunk | The Alleged "Shoe Print" on the Trunk Lid | The Police Uniform Theory | N.C. Department of Transportation Map | Salisbury Telephone Book | Time Line | The Tape Evidence | Ballistics Evidence - Gunnarsson | Kay Weden and I Meet | An Unbelievable Theory | Shirley Scott & the 404(b) Hearing | Gunnarsson Alive? | Who was Viktor Gunnarsson | Three Strange Men | A Confession to Gunnarsson's Murder | Robbie Smith | The Missing Key | Brandon Shelton's Confession to Investigators? | One Puzzling Question | Coincidences? You be the Judge | Death of Catherine Miller | The Miller Evidence | Rex Allen Keller, Jr. | Beth Pitts | Kay Weden - Jason Weden | A Suspect in the Miller Murder | Still So Many Unanswered Questions
Salisbury Telephone Book
During the search of my residence, the
investigating officers found a Salisbury North Carolina telephone book.
It was the state’s theory that I used this phone book to look up
Gunnarsson’s correct address after having Deputy Rick Hillard run
Gunnarsson’s license tag number on the night of December 3, 1993. The
tag came back to the victim at a Grove Street address, not the Lakewood
Apartment address where he lived. The state’s theory was that after
looking up Gunnarsson’s correct address, I went to his apartment,
kidnapped him and drove him to Watauga County where I killed him.
Again, Mr. Marquette addressed this
evidence in the state’s brief to the Court of Appeals. However, trial
testimony from Detective Paula Townsend and Agent Steve Wilson of the
S.B.I. showed that there were no marks in the telephone book under
Gunnarsson’s name nor was Gunnarsson’s name found on any papers at my
home (TP. 1614) (Volume II, TP 487).
Agent Wilson clearly testified that I had
a telephone listed in my name and that the telephone book was found in
the appropriate place by the telephone at my residence (TP 1614) (Volume
II, TP 487).
Again my appellate counsel never
addressed this issue in my brief to the court and the Appeals Court
based their decision on this piece of evidence in the state’s brief and
not the true evidence developed at trial, that no evidence was presented
that connected the Salisbury telephone book in any way to this crime.
|
